and I don't think I would pay $200 for any racket when there are a wide variety of used, quality rackets out there.Īlthough mustreg and I clearly disagree on babolat rackets (there's a weird anti babolat thing out there in the ether) I do agree that yonex makes good stuff and have heard some compare the DR 98 ezone to the pure drive. Just a throw away comment really cause I liked the look of the old one. same name as the 2014 version you're considering.ĭon't mind the new paint job or anything. I wouldn't get distracted by the "Project One7" name - you would otherwise simply be looking at a 2017 "Pure Strike 16x19". Incidentally, I believe Babolat made a bunch of Pure Strike 16x19 for pre-market play-testing, and code-named it "Project One7" to either avoid spoiling the launch, or to generate hype (search Youtube for "Project One7" reviews). This is why I suspect the 16x19 2014 vs 2017 is probably not much different. "FSI Power") and came out with a similar group of rackets for the 2017 Pure Strike family. I don't know for sure, but it looks to me like Babolat refreshed their colors, added some marketing BS (i.e. Similarly there are 6 Pure Strike variants in the 2017 family. Some other versions I can't remember, but they were built like the VS and the 100 rackets that are part of the 2017 line-up. There were 4+ Pure Strike variants of the black/orange color scheme (circa 2014).ġ8x20 tour (heavier version of the above) One thing to keep in mind - some of the other comments here are referring to "Pure Strike" like it is a specific racket. Based on specs and construction I don't believe the two variants are much different, but admit I haven't hit with the 2017 16x19. This subreddit discusses all levels of tennis, from tour professionals to recreational players.Īs far as I know the 2014 16x19 version was the same up until the 2017 replacement.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |